Voorhees Woman Charged With Child Pornography Offenses
Saturday, April 19, 2025, 6:30 A.M. ET. 2 Minute Read, By Art Fletcher: Englebrook Independent News,
VOORHEES, NJ.- On Thursday, a 20-year-old Voorhees, New Jersey, woman was taken into custody and jailed after being charged in connection with allegedly distributing and possessing digital images and video files depicting the sexual exploitation and sexual abuse of children.
According to Camden County Prosecutor Grace C. MacAulay, on Thursday, April 17, 2025, Makayla Johnson, 20, of Voorhees, was formally charged with second-degree Distribution of Child Pornography; second-degree Possession with Intent to Distribute Child Pornography; and third-degree Possession of Child Pornography.
The charges stem from an investigation that began, when members of the Camden County Prosecutor’s Office High Tech Crimes Unit received a CyberTip from the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children regarding an individual that was allegedly utilizing an online instant messaging application “Snapchat” to distribute child pornography.
Detectives Uncover Child Pornography On Johnson’s Phone
During the investigation, Detectives were able to identify Johnson as the user of the Snapchat account. On Thursday, Detectives obtained and executed a court-authorized search of Johnson’s Voorhees residence. During the search and a subsequent forensic examination of Johnson’s cellular phone, Detectives uncovered digital images and video files depicting child pornography.
Following the search, on Thursday, Johnson was taken into custody at her residence in Voorhees, New Jersey. Johnson was processed on the charges and was remanded to the Camden County Correctional Facility, pending future court proceedings in Camden County Superior Court in Camden, New Jersey.
“The rules of the court require us to include a statement that states: The charges outlined in this publication are merely accusations, and the defendants and or defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt.”